Whether for health reasons or concerns about the environment, eating less or no meat is becoming more popular around the globe. But as a new WHO/Europe factsheet points out, some plant-based meat and dairy substitutes may not be better for people’s health.
Many of these plant-based substitutes, also known as analogues, can be defined as ultra-processed foods (UPFs), which means they have a high energy density and tend to be high in sodium, saturated fat and free sugars, and lacking in dietary fibre and in vitamins and minerals found in unprocessed foods (including animal-based foods) and minimally processed plant-based foods.
“The aspiration for healthier living and a healthier environment is changing people’s diets across the WHO European Region – and that is wonderful,” said Dr Kremlin Wickramasinghe of the WHO European Office, “but we need to remember that plant-based diets can be very different from one another and should not automatically be considered healthy.”
Research has shown that frequent consumption of UPFs can lead to negative health impacts. The situation is worrying as consumers are led to believe that products like plant-based UPFs are healthy when, in reality, they are not. Clearly, in this context, there is a need for a well-established knowledge base to build strong, effective policy to guide industry and consumers.
Recommending a shift towards plant-based diets or reduced consumption of meat and dairy is not enough to improve planetary and public health. To assist policy-makers with developing evidence-based dietary guidelines, food policy and general health advice, a clear and coherent evidence-based message must be delivered.
To create the required knowledge base, WHO/Europe recommends:
Read the factsheet ‘Plant-based diets and their impact on health, sustainability and the environment’
Who.nl
Beeld: © mariya_evlakhova/Shutterstock
Source: World Health Organisation