Where are the alternatives for harmful PFAS?

The potential European ban on PFAS, set to possibly come into effect in 2025, is pressuring Dutch scientists and industrialists to find alternatives for these harmful substances. PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), found in products from frying pans to raincoats, pose a health and environmental risk. These substances are not only ubiquitous but also chemically unique due to their ability to repel water, oil, and dirt. However, the search for safe alternatives faces significant challenges.

Chemical challenges

The main difficulty in replacing PFAS lies in their unique chemical properties. These substances combine water, oil, and dirt repelling properties due to their strong fluorine bonds. Unfortunately, these same fluorine bonds also cause their persistence in the environment and their toxic effects. Since the useful aspects of PFAS are also the source of the problems, they are not easily substituted by a safe variant. Alternatives such as ceramic layers exist for some applications, like in pans, but these materials are not versatile enough for use in other products, such as rainwear or cosmetics.

Innovation and research

Despite the urgent need for alternatives, research in this area remains limited. Many scientists primarily focus on monitoring PFAS, while developing replacement substances remains a complicated and challenging process. Research initiatives, such as those at Wageningen University & Research, are concentrating on essential PFAS groups, particularly for packaging and special membranes. However, solutions must come from multiple sources. Daan van Es, a researcher in Sustainable Circular Chemistry, stresses the need for biobased alternatives that are biodegradable. Nevertheless, the scalability and availability of raw materials remain significant hurdles.

Industrial and policy challenges

In addition to scientific and technical challenges, industrial and policy factors play a role. Industries are reluctant to make changes due to high costs. Historically, companies tend to prove that potentially harmful substances are harmless, a process that can take decades. Only when it is conclusively shown that substances are harmful does the search for alternatives begin. This pattern has been seen previously with heavy metals in plastics and paints.

The way forward

With the prospect of a European ban in 2025, there is pressure to develop alternatives for PFAS. Research institutions and industries must shift their focus from monitoring to producing replacement substances. With additional funding and policy measures from the government, it is possible to unravel the complex chemistry behind PFAS and work towards effective replacements. While initial research is promising, it remains a challenging and lengthy endeavor. Achieving a PFAS-free future requires joint efforts from science, industry, and policy.

wur.nl/en